WSL is targeted toward developers, particularly those working in web development, as they don't need access to the kernel very often. If you just need command-line programs such as languages or compilers, WSL may be ideal for you. You can run WSL with less memory than you would need for a virtual machine. While WSL 2 actually uses the Linux kernel running under Hyper-V, you won't have as much of a performance hit than with a VM because you aren't running most of the other processes that run on a Linux system. The overhead for running WSL is also much lower than with a full VM. It's an easy way to learn the Linux command-line without having to learn a new operating system completely. WSL is a good solution if you're completely new to Linux and don't want to contend with installing a Linux system and dual-booting. Using a hypervisor like VirtualBox will give you a wider choice of distributions. While major distros like Ubuntu, Debian, openSUSE, and Alpine Linux, are available on WSL, other more obscure distros are less represented. While WSL offers a choice of distributions, it's still limited in the Microsoft Store. If you want to try the different window managers and desktop environments that Linux has to offer, you have to use some workarounds with WSL in the stable version.įor those who want to try different distros, you'll also be better off using VMs. If you need access to graphical apps on Linux, a virtual machine is still a better bet at the moment, even as Microsoft promises support for GUI apps in WSL. If you're considering a career in IT, knowledge of these things will be crucial. If you're learning Linux and want to get into the nitty-gritty of installing and configuring a Linux system, a virtual machine is the best option. Sometimes, running Linux in a virtual machine using a hypervisor like VirtualBox makes the most sense.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |